This order grants the applicant's motion to condone a 130-day delay in filing an appeal against a Single Judge judgment. The court accepted sufficient cause for the delay caused by a wrongly filed review petition.
Motion to condone delay of 130 days in filing the Appeal is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nma 842-2013
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 842 OF 2013 IN APPEAL NO. 241 OF 2013 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 808 OF 2012
Mrs.Meena Umesh Petkar ...Applicant / Appellant
vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited ..Respondent
Mr.Jayendra Khairnar for the Applicant. Mr.S.R. Page for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND S.C. GUPTE, JJ.
10 JULY 2013
P.C. :
There is a delay of one hundred and thirty days in filing the Appeal against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 30 October 2012. The Applicant had wrongly filed a Review Petition and hence, the delay occurred. The application for condonation is not opposed. Sufficient cause is shown. The Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal is allowable.
Mrs.Meena Umesh Petkar
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
S.C. GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
