Notice of Motion allowing an appeal in an arbitration petition. The court accepted the explanation for the 90-day delay in filing the appeal and granted the motion as prayed.
Motion made absolute allowing the appeal; delay of 90 days accepted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMA72-8.7
1/1
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.72 OF 2013 IN APPEAL (LODG.) NO.37 OF 2013 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.432 OF 2006
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. versus Ram Builders
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Ms. S.I. Shah i/b S.I. Shah and Co. Appellant. Ms. Bhadra Dalal for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND S.C.GUPTE, JJ.
8 July 2013.
P.C. :
There is a delay of ninety days in filing the Appeal which has been satisfactorily explained. The Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.
Ram Builders
D.Y. Chandrachud
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
