High Court of Bombay dismissed an appeal via notice of motion without taking steps, resulting in the proceedings ceasing to be on the file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nma 2497-2012
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2497 OF 2012 IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 569 OF 2012 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 917 OF 1997 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2980 OF 1997
WITH
APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 569 OF 2012
Mr.Vijay Kumar Jayanti Prasad & Ors. ..Applicants/ Appellants
versus
SICOM Limited ..Respondent
Mr.Jamshed Ansari for the Applicants.
Mr.Wasim Qureshi i/b.M/s.Prakash Punjabi & Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND S.C. GUPTE, JJ.
22 JULY 2013.
P.C. :
The Appeal stands dismissed under Rule 986 in pursuance of the order of the Prothonotary and Senior Master dated 11 October 2012. No steps have been taken. Hence, the Appeal and Motion, therefore, cease to be on the file.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Mr.Vijay Kumar Jayanti Prasad & Ors.
SICOM Limited
D.Y. Chandrachud
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
