Allowed
M/S Honeywell Automation India Limited v. Dcit ,Circle 7
Bombay HCNMA/1086/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nma-1086.sxw
ASN
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1086 OF 2013 IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1208 OF 2013
M/s. Honeywell Automation India Ltd. ..Appellant.
vs.
DCIT, Circle-7, Pune.
..Respondent.
Mr. Sanjiv M.Shah for the Appellant. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. AND M.S. SANKLECHA, J. 08 August 2013
PC:
In spite of service of first notice on 31 July 2013 and second notice on 5 August 2013 indicating that motion for con donation of delay and appeal will come up for hearing, none appears on behalf of the respondent. In fact second notice was served on 5 August 2013 indicating today's date. However, in spite of notice of hearing today none is present on behalf of the respondent.
nma-1086.sxw
ASN
2/2
of 2013 for the assessment year 1999-2000 have already been entertained by order dated 20 March 2013 of this Court in Income Tax Appeal Nos. 85 of 2012 and 86 of 2012 for the assessment years 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 in respect of the same appellant. 3) Therefore, Notice of Motion is allowed in term of prayer clause (a). 4) Accordingly, Notice of Motion stands disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
M. S. SANKLECHA, J.
M/s. Honeywell Automation India Ltd.
DCIT, Circle-7, Pune
Mohit S. Shah
M. S. Sanklecha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court