This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 386 OF 2012
IN
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 374 OF 2011
M/S. ESMERALDA DEVELOPERS REP. BY ITS PARTNER MR. JAGDISH BHOBE AND ANR.,
... Applicants
Versus
MR. RAMAKANT PARAB AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents
Ms. V. Shetye, Advocate for the Applicants.
Coram:R. M. SAVANT, J. Date:9th October, 2013
P.C.:
The office note indicates that respondents no.1(a) to 1(d), who are the heirs of the respondent no.1, are served. In view thereof, the above Civil Application for reservice on the respondents no.1(a) to 1(d) is worked out and stands disposed of as such.
R. M. SAVANT, J.
NH
M/S. ESMERALDA DEVELOPERS BBCS BY ITS PARTNER MR. JAGDISH BHOBE
MR. RAMAKANT PARAB AND 3 ORS.
R. M. SAVANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
