Letters Patent Appeal rejected. The court found no perversity in the trial court's decree based on bona fide requirements upholding the respondent's claim.
Letters Patent Appeal rejected; suit decree upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 lpa179.13.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Letters Patent Appeal No.179 of 2013 in Writ Petition No.4145 of 2012
Sau. Jaya W/o Alkeshrao Vidhale vs. Smt. Saraswatibai Wd/o Chandrakant Bokde
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Shri C.N.Deshpande, counsel for the Appellant.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & P. N. DESHMUKH, JJ . DATE : 23 JULY, 2013.
We see no perversity in the order passed by the learned trial Judge thereby decreeing the suit on the ground of bona fide requirement and the order passed by the learned appellate court upholding the same, which has been confirmed by the learned Single Judge by a reasoned order. Hence, letters patent appeal is rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
!! BRW !!
...../-
Sau. Jaya W/o Alkeshrao Vidhale
Smt. Saraswatibai Wd/o Chandrakant Bokde
B. R. GAVAI
P. N. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
