First Appeal No. 619 of 2011 disposed of. Parties settled dispute via consent terms. Appellants admitted four sale deeds were void. Appeal disposed of in terms of consent, excluding respondent No. 2.
Appeal disposed of in terms of the consent terms marked for identification, with the agreement that four sale deeds are invalid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
1.fa.619.11
ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 619 OF 2011
Khurshid Saifuddin Bohri and another
.. Appellants
Vs.
Usha Dilip Mirchandani & another
.. Respondents
Ms.Mugdha Patil i/b Mr.S.S.Patwardhan, for Appellants. Ms.Brigitta John i/b M/s.Wadia Ghandy & Co., for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J . DATE : 02nd September, 2013
P.C. :
. Not on board. Mentioned at the request of the learned Counsel for the appellants and respondent No.1. Hence, taken up in the Production Board. On the oral application made by Ms. Patil, respondent No.2 is deleted from the present proceedings.
-: 2 :- 1.fa.619.11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be disposed of based on the settlement and consent terms tendered by the parties.
Khurshid Saifuddin Bohri
Usha Dilip Mirchandani
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
