The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a first appeal against an award under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act without deciding the merits, directing the Tribunal to decide the proceedings expeditiously.
The appeal and the civil application were disposed of; the record was sent back to the Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FIRST APPEAL NO.259 OF 2012 WITH C.A.NO.1978 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's
orders or directions
andRegistrar's
orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.Abhijit Choudhari, advocate holding for
Mr.D.J.Choudhari, advocate for the appellant.
Mr.S.R.Bodade, advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.
Date : 01.04.2013.
PER COURT :
2
Company could not have been exonerated from making payment.
(S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.01.04.2013. asp/office/Fa259.12
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant can demonstrate a person holding a permanent license was sitting besides the driver holding a learner's license to reliefs under the Motor Vehicles Act.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Appellant
Respondent No.3
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court