Sudipto Ghosal v. Jaya Ghosal
Case brief
What is this about?
Chamber summons allowed caveator to file delayed affidavit. High Court permitted condonation of three-week delay in filing affidavit due to absence out of town.
What did the court decide?
Office directed to accept affidavit in support of caveat; chamber summons disposed.
What the court decided
.. 1 .. 909-CST-71/13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY .
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.71 OF 2013
IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.70 OF 2013
IN
PETITION NO.362 OF 2013
Subroto Ghosal … Applicant In the matter between : Sudipto Ghosal … Plaintiff. Vs. Subroto Ghosal … Caveator
Ms N. Almedia i/b Ms Armaity Khushrushahi for applicant/Caveator. Mr Sudipto Ghosal respondent present in person.
CORAM : R.D.DHANUKA J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 17, 2013.
P.C.
By this chamber summons filed by the caveator, caveator seeks condonation of delay of three weeks in filing affidavit in support of filing caveat.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Subroto Ghosal
- respondent
Sudipto Ghosal
Coram
R.D. Dhانuka
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court