Disposed

Champalal Motilal Steel Company Pvt.Ltd. v. ---

Bombay HC13 Jun 2013CSP/511/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court disposed of four separate company scheme petitions filed by associates of Champalal Motilal Steel Company. The court granted leave to each petitioner to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions under the Companies Act.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw the company scheme petitions with liberty to file fresh company petitions under the Companies Act, 1956.

Champalal Motilal Steel Company Pvt.Ltd. Vs --- — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2013)

¶1

¶2

2-CSPL-444-13 to 447-13

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

COMPANY SCHEME PETITION LODGING NO.444 OF 2013

¶5

¶6

COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO.421 OF 2013

¶7

In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956; And

¶8

In the matter of Section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956; And

¶9

In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of Champalal Motilal Steel Company Pvt. Ltd., Pheonix Impex Pvt. Ltd. and Poscho Steels Pvt. Ltd. with Akshata Mercantile Pvt. Ltd.

¶10

Champalal Motilal Steel Company Pvt. Ltd. ....Petitioner Company.

¶11

Mr. Ramesh Saraogi, advocate for the Petitioner Company.

¶12

CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J.

¶13

DATED : June 13, 2013.

¶14

Shivgan

¶15

¶16

2-CSPL-444-13 to 447-13

¶17

P.C.:

¶18

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner company seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh company petition under the Companies Act, 1956. Leave with liberty as prayed for, is granted.

¶19

2 The Company Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn

¶20

with the aforesaid liberty.

¶21

(RANJIT MORE, J.)

¶22

Shivgan

¶23

¶24

2-CSPL-444-13 to 447-13

¶25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SCHEME PETITION LODGING NO.445 OF 2013

¶26

¶27

COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO.422 OF 2013

¶28

In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956; And In the matter of Section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956; And In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of Champalal Motilal Steel Company Pvt. Ltd., Pheonix Impex Pvt. Ltd. and Poscho Steels Pvt. Ltd. with Akshata Mercantile Pvt. Ltd.

¶29

Pheonix Impex Pvt.Ltd.

¶30

....Petitioner Company.

¶31

Mr. Ramesh Saraogi, advocate for the Petitioner Company.

¶32

CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J.

¶33

DATED : June 13, 2013.

¶34

Shivgan

¶35

¶36

2-CSPL-444-13 to 447-13

¶37

P.C.:

¶38

¶39

2 The Company Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶40

(RANJIT MORE, J.)

¶41

Shivgan

¶42

¶43

2-CSPL-444-13 to 447-13

¶44

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SCHEME PETITION LODGING NO.446 OF 2013

¶45

¶46

COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO.423 OF 2013

¶47

¶48

Poscho Steels Pvt.Ltd.

¶49

....Petitioner Company.

¶50

Mr. Ramesh Saraogi, advocate for the Petitioner Company.

¶51

CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J.

¶52

DATED : June 13, 2013.

¶53

Shivgan

¶54

¶55

2-CSPL-444-13 to 447-13

¶56

P.C.:

¶57

¶58

2 The Company Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶59

(RANJIT MORE, J.)

¶60

Shivgan

¶61

2-CSPL-444-13 to 447-13

¶62

¶63

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶64

COMPANY SCHEME PETITION LODGING NO.447 OF 2013

¶65

¶66

COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO.424 OF 2013

¶67

In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956; And In the matter of Section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956; And

¶68

In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of Champalal Motilal Steel Company Pvt. Ltd., Pheonix Impex Pvt. Ltd. and Poscho Steels Pvt. Ltd. with Akshata Mercantile Pvt. Ltd.

¶69

Akshata Mercantile Pvt. Ltd.

¶70

....Petitioner Company.

¶71

Mr. Ramesh Saraogi, advocate for the Petitioner Company.

¶72

CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J.

¶73

DATED : June 13, 2013.

¶74

Shivgan

¶75

¶76

2-CSPL-444-13 to 447-13

¶77

P.C.:

¶78

¶79

2 The Company Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶80

(RANJIT MORE, J.)

¶81

Shivgan

Champalal Motilal Steel Company Pvt.Ltd. v. ---

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Champalal Motilal Steel Company Pvt.Ltd. v. ---

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Gyasilal Ghansuram Sharma Vs Sau. Jayashri. Vasant Pawar and Anr.

Icici Bank Limited Vs Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Icici Bank Ltd.----Applicant Vs Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Sunanda Textile Engineers Pvt.Ltd. Vs the Official Liquidator, High Court of Bombay of Matushree Textiles Ltd.

Sunanda Textile Engineers Pvt.Ltd. Vs the Official Liquidator, Liquidator. High Court, Bombay of M/S.Matushree Textiles Ltd.

M/S. Anuj Tex Processors Pvt.Ltd. Vs the Official Liquidator of M/S.Anuj Tex Processors Pvt. Ltd.