The petition was disposed of as withdrawn based on amicably resolved dispute terms consented to by parties and executed consent terms taken on record by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2cp542-12.sxw
spb/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 542 OF 2012
Bay Forge Ltd.,
... Petitioner.
V/s.
Vulcan Industrial Engineering Co.Ltd.. ... Respondent.
Mr.Purazar Fauzdar i/by J. Sagar Associates for the Petitioner.
Mr. Yashpal M. Jain for the Respondent.
CORAM : N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 17TH JULY, 2013
P.C. :
1 The learned counsel appearing for the
respective parties state that the parties have amicably resolved their dispute and have executed the Consent Terms, which have been signed by both the parties and their Advocates. The learned counsels pray that the Consent Terms be taken on record and the Petition be disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. Accordingly, the “Consent Terms” are taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
1/2
Borey
spb/ 2cp542-12.sxw
2 The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Demand Draft mentioned in the Consent Terms has been received by the Petitioner.
3 Order in terms of the said Consent Terms. Accordingly the Petition is disposed of as withdrawn as per the terms provided in the Consent Terms marked “X”.
2/2
Borey
Bay Forge Ltd.
Vulcan Industrial Engineering Co. Ltd.
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
