The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, disposed of a contempt petition alleging disobedience of a previous order in a writ petition case when the respondent informed that the order had been complied with.
Contempt petition disposed of; Notice stands discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cp45.13
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 45 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5859 OF 2011
[ Devidas S. Vasave vs. Swadheen Kshatriya and another. ]
Office Notes, OfficeMemoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’sorders or directionsand Registrar’sorders |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
|---|---|
Mr. Sandeep G. Kulkarni, Advocate forpetitioner. |
|
Mr. D.R. Kale, AGP for respondents. |
|
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J.DATE : 17thAPRIL, 2013 |
|
PER COURT : |
|
. The learned A.G.P. makes a statement |
|
that, the order of which disobedience has |
|
been alleged in this contempt petition has |
|
been complied with. Statement is not |
|
disputed by the Counsel for the petitioner. |
|
The Contempt Petition stands disposed of. |
|
Notice stands discharged. |
|
sut/Apr13 |
[S.S. SHINDE, J.] |
Devidas S. Vasave
Swadheen Kshatriya
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court