Petitioner and respondent amicably resolved a company dispute via consent terms. The court recorded the terms on record and disposed of the petition accordingly. No active parties or precedents cited.
Consent terms taken on record and petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp-369.13.doc
ppn 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.369 OF 2013
M/s. Labdhi Enterprise .. Petitioner Vs. M/s. Trio-Chem Sucrotech Engineering & Projects Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr. N.M. Shah for the petitioner. Mr. Kaushal Varaiya, partner of the petitioner. Mr. Tejesh Dande for the respondent. Mr. Nitin S. Deshpande, Manging Director of the respondent.
CORAM : N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 3 October 2013
P.C. :
. The learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have amicably resolved the dispute and have executed consent terms. The learned counsel for the parties pray that the consent terms be taken on record and the petition be disposed of in terms of consent terms.
N.M. JAMDAR, J.
M/s. Labdhi Enterprise
M/s. Trio-Chem Sucrotech Engineering & Projects Pvt. Ltd.
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
