The petitioner and respondent amicably resolved their dispute via consent terms. The Company Petition was disposed of based on these executed terms, with the respondent's note of appearance requirement addressed.
The Company Petition was disposed of in terms of the consent terms executed by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25cp292-13ct.sxw
spb/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 292 OF 2013
Mr. Sanket Dedhia … Petitioner. V/s.
M/s. Tricom India Limited … Respondent.
Mr. Rakesh Piprodia i/y RMP Legal for the Petitioner. Mr. Sanket Dedhia, the Petitioner, is present. Mr. Paresh Pathak, Director of the Respondent Company is presentin- person.
CORAM : N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 23 OCTOBER, 2013
P.C. :
1 The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the parties have amicably resolved their dispute and have executed the consent terms and, accordingly, pray that the Petition be disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.
2 The 'Consent Terms' signed by the concerned are taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification. Undertakings given in the consent terms are accepted.
3 The Company Petition stands disposed of in terms of the said Consent Terms marked “X”.
4 The respondent to file note of appearance. The Director of the respondent is present- in- person.
(N.M.JAMDAR,J.)
1/1
Borey
Mr. Sanket Dedhia
M/s. Tricom India Limited
N. M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
