Single judge disposed of a contempt petition without costs, holding that the committee had already invalidated the petitioners' claim.
Contempt Petition disposed of without order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) CP. 186-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 186 OF 2013 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 7501 OF 2011
Narendra S/o Dinkar Patil
and othersPetitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents
Mr. S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for the respondent/State.
Mr. S.S. Tope, Advocate for respondent no.2.
CORAM : M. T. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 18/10/2013
ORAL ORDER:
1. Heard.
2.Learned counsel for respondent no.2 submits
that the decision is already taken by the Committee
for Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny and
Verification of Tribe Claim and the claim of the
petitioners is invalidated on 4/10/2013.
3.In that view of the matter, nothing survives
in the present Contempt Petition, the same is
therefore disposed of without any order as to costs.
[M. T. JOSHI, J.]
arp/
Narendra S/o Dinkar Patil
The State of Maharashtra
M. T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court