A company petition was disposed of by the Court after the parties reached an amicable settlement and executed Consent Terms, which were accepted and taken on record.
The petition was disposed of in terms of the signed Consent Terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10cp180-13fl.sxw
spb/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 180 OF 2013
L & T Finance Ltd.,
... Petitioner.
V/s.
Maxx Mobile Communication Ltd.,
... Respondent.
Ms. S. I. Joshi i/by S.I. Joshi & Co. for the Petitioner.
Mr. Shiv K. Singh, Authorized signatory of the Petitioner is present.
Mr. Ravi Goenka a/with Mr. Amol Arote i/by Goenka Law Associates for the Respondent.
Mr. Anandghan Bohra, Authorized signatory of the Respondent is present.
CORAM : N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 27TH AUGUST, 2013
P.C. :
1 The learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and
have executed the Consent Terms. The learned counsel
state that the “Consent Terms” are signed by the representatives of the petitioner and respondent. The learned counsel pray that the petition be disposed of
in terms of the Consent Terms. Accordingly the Consent
Terms are taken on record and marked “X” for
1/2
Borey
spb/ 10cp180-13fl.sxw
identification. The undertakings given in the consent terms are accepted.
2 The petition is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.
3 The learned counsel for the respondent undertakes to file affidavit within two days. Undertaking is accepted.
2/2
Borey
L & T Finance Ltd.
Maxx Mobile Communication Ltd.
N. M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
