In Company Petition No. 151 of 2013, the High Court of Bombay disposed of the petition in terms of consent terms amicably resolved by the parties.
Petition disposed of in terms of the consent terms signed by all concerned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CP151-13.doc
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 151 OF 2013.
Mr.Anand Mehta sole proprietor of M/s Steelman Engineering & Forgings .. Petitioner Vs M/s AG Conveying Systems Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.G.B.Kedia, for petitioner. Mr.Anand Mehta, petitioner present. Mr.Vikram Sutaria i/b Yogesh Jadhav, for respondent. Mr.Nitin Jadhav, Authorised representative of M/s.AG Conveying Systems Pvt. Ltd., of respondent present.
CORAM: N.M.JAMDAR, J. Friday 11 October, 2013
P.C.:
The learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have amicably resolved their dispute and have executed the consent terms. They pray that the petition be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. The consent terms signed by all the concerned are taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification. The Company Peition stands disposed of in terms of the said consent terms.
N.M.JAMDAR, J.
Mr. Anand Mehta sole proprietor of M/s Steelman Engineering & Forgings
M/s AG Conveying Systems Pvt. Ltd.
N.M.JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
