The High Court disposed of a company petition without adjudication after the parties amicably settled their dispute, with the petitioner receiving a demand draft and subsequently withdrawing the petition.
Petition permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CP13-13.doc
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 13 OF 2013
Schindler India Private Limited. .. Petitioner Vs
New Consolidated Constructions Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.Rajmani Varma i/b Navdeep Vora & Associates, for petitioner. Mr.Manish Mazgaokar, Manager Legal, for petitioner. Mr.Suraj Iyer i/b M/s Ganesh & Co., for respondent. Mr.Suhas G.Dhamankar, Manager – Administrator of respondent present.
CORAM: N.M.JAMDAR, J. Wednesday 3 July, 2013
P.C.:
The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent state that the parties have amicably settled their dispute as the claim of the petitioner against respondent – Company is fully satisfied by a demand draft of Rs.4,47,598/- drawn on Vijaya Bank, which has been handed over to the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
N.M.JAMDAR, J.
Schindler India Private Limited
New Consolidated Constructions Ltd.
N.M.Jamdhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
