Chamber summons No.288 of 2010 and No.339 of 2010 presented to the High Court were dismissed with intimation that they were withdrawn by the learned counsel for the plaintiffs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.. 1 .. 7-CHS-288/10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY .
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.288 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.144 OF 2010
Craig Pereyra & Ors.
... Plaintiff
Vs.
The Bombay Catholic CHS. Ltd. & Ors.
... Defendants
WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.339 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.145 OF 2010
Girish Mungrey & Ors. ... Plaintiff Vs. The Bombay Catholic CHS. Ltd. & Ors. ... Defendants
Mr Amit Kherwal i/b M/s Khare Legal Chambers for applicant/plaintiff. Mr Lalan Gupta i/b M/s Dhruv Liladhar for Defendant Nos.1 to 7, 9, 12 & 16.
Ms Akshita Mehta i/b Kishore Thakordas & Co. for Defendant No.20 in Chamber Summons 288 of 2010 and for Defendant No.29 in Chamber Summons No.339 of 2010.
CORAM : R.D.DHANUKA J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 20, 2013.
P.C.
Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff submits that both these
chamber summons do not survive and are accordingly not pressed by the
1/2
Asmita
.. 2 ..
7-CHS-288/10
plaintiff.
costs.
( R.D.DHANUKA, J.)
2/2
Asmita
Craig Pereyra & Ors.
The Bombay Catholic CHS. Ltd. & Ors.
Girish Mungrey & Ors.
The Bombay Catholic CHS. Ltd. & Ors.
R.D. Dhნuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
