Disposed
Abdul Sattar Haji Usman and Anr. v. the Archbishop of Bombay and 4 Ors.
Bombay HCCHS/2073/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
hvn IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.. 1 ..
28-chs-2073.2011.sxw
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY . ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 2073 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO. 2862 OF 2008
Abdul Sattar Haji Usman and anr.
… Plaintiffs
Versus
The Archbishop of Bombay and anr.
… Defendants
Mr. Shreepad Murthy alongwith Vrushali Gulwadi i/by Ashish Mehta for the applicfnant.
Mr. V. Vaghela for respondents.
(NO R & P)
CORAM : R.D.DHANUKA J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 05, 2013.
P.C.
Chamber summons has been filed by the plaintiffs for seeking amendment of the plaint in accordance with the schedule appended to Chamber summons. From the reasons recorded in the affidavit in support of Chamber summons, Chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. Amended copy of the plaint would be served on defendants within two weeks after carrying out the said amendment. Chamber summons is disposed of.
(R.D.DHANUKA, J.)
Abdul Sattar Haji Usman and anr.
The Archbishop of Bombay and anr.
R.D. Dhanna J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court