Application dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the applicant, who was absent on multiple occasions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kvm
1/1
19-CHS1809.10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1809 OF 2010 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 780 OF 2010 IN ARBITRATION NO. ARBIT-LOT-1-699 OF 2009
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited ..... Claimants VERSUS Rakesh N.Tripathi ..... Respondent AND Nagendranath R. Tripathi ..... Applicant
None for the Applicant.
Mr.Nikhil Rajani, i/b. V.Deshpande for the Respondent.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATED : 27th SEPTEMBER, 2013
P.C.
On perusal of Roznama, it appears that this matter was on board on 30th September, 2011, 26th April, 2013, 12th June, 2013 and 10th July, 2013 when none appeared for the applicant. Matter has been adjourned from time to time since applicant was absent. Even today, none appeared for the applicant. Application is dismissed for default.
[R.D. DHANUKA, J.]
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Rakesh N. Tripathi
Nagendranath R. Tripathi
R.D. Dhanuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
