The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, listed a writ petition for final hearing. A civil application seeking to stay an enquiry was rejected with no ground made out.
The civil application (CAW No. 72/2013) for staying the enquiry was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP5667-09
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 5667/2009
(SHATTARKA NAGRI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA VERSUS ASSISTANT P.F. COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri S.S. Ghate, counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. U.R. Tanna, counsel for the respondent.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 1, 2013.
The writ petition may be listed for final hearing along with Writ Petition No.1106/2009 on 01.03.2013.
C.A.W. NO. 72/2013 .
No ground has been made out for staying the enquiry under notice dated 15.10.2012 during the pendency of the writ petition merely because the writ petition is admitted and the issue as to whether the pigmy agents are the 'employees' is pending for consideration.
The civil application stands rejected.
JUDGE
APTE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any ground is made out for staying the enquiry under notice dated 15.10.2012 merely because the writ petition is admitted and the issue of employment status is pending.
Shattarka Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha
Assistant P.F. Commissioner, Nagpur
Vasanti A. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
