Application disposed; Applicant permitted to file claim with Liquidator which shall be processed on merits; State Government directed to consider Applicant's representation.
Applicant at liberty to file claim before Liquidator for processing on merits; State Government to consider representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CAW. 41-13
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 41 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION No. 6377 OF 2008
Ichalkaranji Municipal Council ... Applicant Vs. Raoso Narsagonda Patil & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Akshay P. Shinde, for the Applicant.
Mrs. M. P. Thakur, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 (in Orig. Petition). ***
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & K. R. SHRIRAM, JJ. DATE : JULY 2, 2013.
P.C.
. The Applicant – Ichalkaranji Municipal Council is at liberty to file their claim before the Liquidator. If such a claim is filed by the Applicant, said claim be processed by the Liquidator on merits and in accordance with law. The State Government may consider representation of the Applicant. With these directions, Civil Application is disposed of.
Vinayak Halemath
Ichalkaranji Municipal Council
Raoso Narsagonda Patil & Ors.
V. M. Kanade
K. R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
