The applicant appeared in person and was absent. The civil application was rejected at this stage because the letters patent appeal is pending and there is heavy pendency of matters.
The civil application was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP6089-11
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
C.A.W. NO.280/2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6089/2011
(PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER VERSUS PRABHAKAR NARAYANRAO MOHADARKAR & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri S.M. Bhagde, A.G.P. for the R-2. Shri R.D. Bhuibhar, counsel for the R-3..
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : APRIL 8, 2013.
The applicant appearing in person is not present. It appears that the letters patent appeal is still pending before the Division Bench. The matter cannot be heard by a fixed date in view of the heavy pendency of the matters. The civil application stands rejected at this stage.
JUDGE
APTE
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
PRABHAKAR NARAYANRAO MOHADARKAR
VASANTI A. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
