This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
2908sa441.06.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAS) NOs. 224, 223 & 225 OF 2013 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 441 OF 2006
(Keshaorao Dhondabaji Rode through lrs. Shankar & others Vs. Kashinath Rode through lrs. Jagdish Rode & others )
Mr. N. R. Saboo, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Maldhure, Advocate for the respondents.
CORAM : S. B. SHUKRE, J. DATED : AUGUST 29, 2013
CAS NO. 224/2013 :
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the application,
the application stands allowed and delay caused in
bringing additional legal representatives of respondent No.1 on record is condoned.
CAS NO. 223/2013 :
For the reasons stated in the application,
the application is allowed and abatement of the appeal as against respondent No.1 stands set aside.
CAS NO. 225/2013 :
Proposed additional legal representatives
2/2
2908sa441.06.odt
have been served with notices. However, none appears for them. Learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection and it appears that since nobody is appearing on behalf of the proposed legal representatives, they too have no objection in allowing the application. The application is allowed and the proposed additional legal representatives be brought on record within two weeks.
JUDGE
wwl
Keshaorao Dhondabaji Rode
Kashinath Rode
S. B. SHUKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
