Allowed
Mr. Firoz Dhondilal Tamboli v. Division Controller, M.S.R.T.C.
Bombay HCCAL/90/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.A-90-13.sxw
gopi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.90 OF 2013
IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL STAMP NO.3807 OF 2013 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.7827 OF 2012
Mr. Firoz Dhondilal Tamboli ...Appellant/Applicant Versus Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T.C.,Solapur ..Respondent
Ms. Sangita Salvi i/b. Seema Sarnaik for applicant. Mr. G.S. Hegde i/b. M/s.G.S. Hegde & Associates for respondent.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & M.S. SANKLECHA, J. DATE : 10 April 2013 P .C.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the delay in filing the Letters Patent Appeal is condoned. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
CHIEF JUSTICE
M.S. SANKLECHA, J.
1 of 1
Gopi
Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T.C., Solapur
MOHIT S. SHAH
M.S. SANKLECHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court