In a Civil Application, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay condoned the delay in filing a first appeal filed by senior citizens. The court observed that the delay was neither intentional nor deliberate.
Delay in filing the first appeal is condoned and the petition is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
50.CAF2498_2012
Vidya amin
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2498 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL (St.) NO. 13438 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Ms. Ujita Badhekar i/b. Mr. Dinesh Tiwari for the applicants.
Ms. D. Shalini Shankar for respondent no. 3.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 23rd October, 2013.
P.C.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Perused the averments in the application. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are senior citizens, therefore, the application may be allowed.
1 Of 2
50.CAF2498_2012
the matter and in view of the fact that by delay in filing the appeal, the applicants have not been benefitted in any manner and the delay is neither intentional nor deliberate, therefore, the same deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
2 Of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing the first appeal by senior citizens deserves to be condoned in absence of intentional or deliberate delay.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vidya amin and others
Respondent no. 1
Respondent no. 3
S.S. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
