Court permitted condonation of 47-day delay in filing first appeal under Family Courts Act due to petitioner's travel obligations in Nagpur. No malafides found. Appeal registered and interim order continued.
Delay of 47 days in filing appeal condoned. First appeal registered. Interim order continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CAF No. 196 of 2013 In FA (St) No. 1516 of 2013 Smt Swati v.Prasanjit Sarkar
_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr R. F. Isaac, Adv for petitioner
CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A. B. CHAUDHARI, JJ
DATED : 16th April 2013
caused in filing First Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act. Submission is, as the applicant was pre-occupied and out of Nagpur, she could not take timely steps. Our attention has been invited to certificate dated 2.4.2013 issued by Shaan World Travels. The certificate shows that applicant undertook tour development management programme with the said organization for a period from 3rd October 2012 to 20th December 2012.
2
JUDGE JUDGE
joshi
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay of 47 days in filing the first appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act should be condoned?
Whether the certificate of tour development management programme explains the unavoidable delay?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt Swati
Prasanjit Sarkar
B.P. Dharmadhikari
A.B. Chaudhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
