Condoned 21-day delay in filing civil appeal against a previously dismissed order regarding respondent no. 1. Application allowed.
Delay in filing appeal condoned; application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAF-1419-12
skc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1419 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 7718 OF 2012
Atul Rasiklal Shah .. Applicant /Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Shree Laxmi Developers and Constructions Co. & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Ashok C. Giri for Applicant / Appellant.
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J. DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2013.
1] Filing of First Stamp Stamp No. 7718 of 2012 is delayed by 21 days.
2] Application is already dismissed as far as respondent no. 1 is concerned.
3] Office note shows that respondent no. 2 is served. None appears for respondent no. 2.
1/2
CAF-1419-12
skc
to which delay is caused, delay of 21 days caused in filing of appeal is condoned.
(A. H. JOSHI, J.)
Chandka
2/2
Atul Rasiklal Shah
M/s. Shree Laxmi Developers and Constructions Co.
A. H. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
