The High Court dismissed an application for substituted service, holding it did not survive as one respondent was legally represented and served in the underlying appeal.
Application for substituted service dismissed as it does not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAF-1201-13
skc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1201 OF 2013 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1134 OF 2012
United India Assurance Co. Ltd. ..Applicant/Appellant Versus Sureshkumar Parasnath Singh & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. K. W. Vitonde for Applicant / Appellant. Ms Pallavi Dabholkar i/b. A. M. Gokhale for Respondent No. 1.
Mr. K. S. Bapat i/b. G. H. Keluskar for Respondent No. 3.
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 5TH APRIL, 2013.
1] This is an application for substituted service on respondent nos. 1 and 2.
2] Respondent no.1 is represented through Advocate. In first appeal respondent No. 2 is served and affidavit of service is filed to that effect.
3] In the circumstances, civil application no. 1201 of 2013 for substituted service does not survive and is dismissed.
Chandka
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether civil application for substituted service survives given that respondent no. 1 is represented by an advocate.
United India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Sureshkumar Parasnath Singh
A. H. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
