Appeared before the Bombay High Court. Civil Applications filed for condonation of delay were allowed. No costs awarded.
Civil Application Nos. 679/2013, 680/2013, 683/2013, 688/2013, 717/2013 filed for condonation of delay are allowed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-ao657.13.sxw
ssm 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 657 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 793 OF 2013 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 657 OF 2013
Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Anr. Vs.
….Appellants.
Shivram C. Mhadaye ….Respondent.
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 679 OF 2013 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 8314 OF 2013
Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Anr. ….Applicants. Vs.
Smt. Sharda Navin Jethava ….Respondent.
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 680 OF 2013 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 8302 OF 2013
Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Anr. ….Applicants. Vs.
Mohammed Saeed Qureshi & Ors. ….Respondents.
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 683 OF 2013 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 8476 OF 2013
Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Anr. ….Applicants. Vs.
Wasim Khwaja Qureshi ….Respondent.
1/2
14-ao657.13.sxw
ssm 2
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 688 OF 2013 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 8286 OF 2013
Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Anr.
….Applicants.
Vs.
Smt. Sudha Raju Rane W/o. Raju Rane
….Respondent.
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 717 OF 2013 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 8324 OF 2013
Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Anr. ….Applicants.
Vs.
Harron Ahmed ….Respondent.
Mr. S.S. Pakle a/w Mr. S.S. Kulkarni i/by Mr. U.H. Kedar for the Appellant-Corporation.
Mr. Anil Singh, Senior Advocate i/by Ms. Neeta Solanki for the Respondent.
Ms. Shweta Singh for the Respondent/s in AOST 8302 of 2013 and AOST 8476 of 2013.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 28 OCTOBER 2013.
P.C.:-
Appeal from orders adjourned to 29 October 2013.
2 Considering the averments made and as the case is made
out, the Civil Application Nos. 679/2013, 680/2013, 683/2013, 688/2013, 717/2013 filed for condonation of delay are allowed. No costs.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay applications in multiple appeals and civil applications were admissible.
Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Anr.
Shivram C. Mhadaye
Smt. Sharda Navin Jethava
Mohammed Saeed Qureshi & Ors.
Wasim Khwaja Qureshi
Smt. Sudha Raju Rane W/o. Raju Rane
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
