Single judge allowed an interim civil application in a writ matter, permitting a necessary amendment within two days. The court found no reason to deny the prayer despite opposition.
Application allowed; necessary amendment to be carried out within two weeks from the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ca9164.11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9164 OF 2011 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 51 OF 2011
[ Pritamsingh Batra & Anr. vs. Kamlesh Prakash Goyal & Anr.]
Office Notes, OfficeMemoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’sorders or directionsand Registrar’sorders |
C |
ourt’s or Judge’s orders |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Mr. N.S. Jaju, AdAdvocate for applMr. K.B. Autade, |
vocaicanAdvo |
te h/f Mr. A.S. Bajaj,ts.cate for R-1 & 2. |
|
CODA |
RAMTE |
: S.S. SHINDE, J.: 8TH FEBRUARY, 2013 |
|
PER COURT : |
|||
. Heard lea |
rned |
Counsel appearing for |
|
the parties. |
|||
2. Though the |
Cou |
nsel appearing for the |
|
respondents has |
ve |
hemently opposed the |
|
application, in |
my |
opinion, there is no |
|
reason to deny |
the |
prayer. Accordingly, |
|
civil application |
is |
allowed in terms of |
|
prayer clause (A) |
, (B |
) and (C), same stands |
| 2 | ca9164.11 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
disposed of. N |
eces |
sary amendment to be |
|
carry out within |
two |
weeks from today. |
|
sut/Feb13 |
[S.S. SHINDE, J.] |
Pritamsingh Batra & Anr.
Kamlesh Prakash Goyal & Anr.
S.S. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court