COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY…
company application allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b); application stands disposed of
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION No. 83 OF 2013 IN COMPANY APPLICATION No. 1306 OF 2007 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 271 OF 2007
M/s. AAFLOAT TEXTILES (INDIA) Ltd.
..Applicant.
In the matter between
BIFR, New Delhi. Versus the Official Liquidator, High Court, Bombay of AAFLOAT TEXTILES (India) Ltd.
..Petitioner.
..Respondent.
Mr. Harihar Bhave i/b Bhave & Co., for the Applicant. Ms. Rupa Sutar, AOL.
Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : March 14, 2013 .
P. C. :
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
1 / 1
patilsr
M/s. AAFLOAT TEXTILES (INDIA) Ltd.
BIFR, New Delhi
Official Liquidator, High Court, Bombay of AAFLOAT TEXTILES (India) Ltd.
RANJIT MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
