The High Court at Goa dismissed the Civil Application as it survived the dismissal of the associated Second Appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2013
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2013
MR. SUVARNKUMAR V. VERLEKAR AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus KISHOR B. VEREKAR (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR'S ... Respondent
Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. J. Simoes, Advocate for the applicants.
Mr. M. B. D'Costa, Senior Advocate with Mr. J. A. Lobo, Advocate for the respondents no.1 to 3, 6 to 8.
Coram:R. M. SAVANT, J.
Date:27th September, 2013
P.C.
In view of the dismissal of the above Second Appeal No.36/2013, the Civil Application does not survive and to accordingly, stand disposed of as such.
R. M. SAVANT, J.
SMA
SUVARNKUMAR V. VERLEKAR AND ANR.
KISHOR B. VEREKAR
R. M. SAVANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
