High Court Bench at Aurangabad allowed Civil Application filed as a follow-up to Writ Petition, permitting final hearing later and disposing of the application based on stated reasons without detailed analysis.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clauses A and B and disposed of; writ petition listed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5684/2013
,In WP/2929/2012
USHA VENKATRAO JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Thombre B.V.
Advocate for Respondent No.2 :Mr.Naiknavare
Ramesh V.
...
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J.
Dated: April 29, 2013
...
PER COURT :-
For the reasons stated in the application,
Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause
“A” and “B” and disposed of.
2.List the Writ Petition for final hearing on
11.06.2013.
...
sga
Usha Venkatroo Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
S. S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court