Civil Application allowed without serving notice to respondents. Matter disposed of based on prayer clauses without recording reasons or substantive reasoning.
Civil Application allowed and disposed of under prayer clauses (A), (B) and (C).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 525 OF 2013 IN R.C. NO. 795 OF 2012 IN W.P. 1807 OF 2008
(Momin Matin Ahmad Mobin Ahmad VS The State of Maharashtra and ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or Judge's Orders orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. P.B. Gapat, Advocate for Applicant/petitioner Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, A.G.P. for the respondent-State
CORAM : S.B. DESHMUKH &
M.T. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 21.02.2013
P.C.:-
arp
Sd/-
Sd/-
Momin Matin Ahmad Mobin Ahmad
The State of Maharashtra
S.B. Deshmukh
M.T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
