Civil Appeal briefly heard; Civil Application allowed; appellant No. 4 transposed as Respondent; matter disposed of without substantive discussion.
Civil Application allowed; Appellant No. 4 transposed as Respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3469 OF 2013 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.141 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's
orders or directions
andRegistrar's
orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.
Date : 19.03.2013.
PER COURT :
Considering the Application, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (C). The appellant No.4 be transposed as Respondent.
(S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.19.03.2013. asp/office/Ca3469.13
2
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court