This court allowed a civil application seeking time to file a reply, noting that applicants were allottees of shops. It ordered amendment to the caption naming applicants as respondents in the original writ petition.
Civil Application allowed in terms of prayer; time for reply granted; caption amendment ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
District : Jalgaon
Civil Application No. 3463 of 2013
(In Writ Petition No. 10 of 2004)
(Shri Suraesh Satramdas Bhateja & 2 others Vs.
Bhumesh s/o. Tarachand Sonar & 6 others)
Appearances : Mr. V.D. Patnoorkar, Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. B.R. Warma, Advocate, for non-applicant nos.1 to 4.
Mr. S.K. Tambe, Assistant Government Pleader, for non-applicant nos.5 and 6.
Mr. A.S. Golegaonkar, Advocate, for non-applicant no.7.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ.
DATE : 13TH SEPTEMBER 2013
COURT'S ORDER :
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE ) ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE JUDGE
bgp/ca3463
Shri Suraesh Satramdas Bhateja & 2 others
Bhumesh s/o. Tarachand Sonar & 6 others
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
