Allowed
Indrasinh Shankarsinh Girase v. the State of Mah and Anr.
Bombay HCCA/1664/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ca 1664.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1664 OF 2013 IN
CROSS OBJECTION NO. 744 OF 2013 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1669 OF 2010
Indrasinh Shankarsinh Girase .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri V. P. Raje, Advocate for the Applicant.
Shri S. K. Kadam, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Mrs. Vaishali Patil Jadhav, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 08TH MARCH, 2013.
PER COURT :
. Issue notice to respondents. The learned A. G. P. waives notice for the respondent No. 1. Mrs. Patil, the learned counsel waives notice for the respondent No. 2.
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/March 13
Indrasinh Shankarsinh Girase
The State of Maharashtra
others
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court