A single-paragraph order disposing of a company application as infructuous because the applicant's grievances were satisfied by a previous order dated 23 July 2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca-105.13.doc
ppn 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION NO.105 OF 2013 IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.113 OF 1997
Prashant Surendra Tanna .. Applicant Vs.
The Official Liquidator of M/s.Suprapti Plastics Ltd.
And
SICOM Ltd.
.. Respondents
Mr. Sanjeev Punalekar a/w Mr. Madhur Rai i/by M/s. PRS Legal for the applicant.
Ms. Jaymala Raut -SICOM.
Ms. Rupa Sutar, Assistant Official Liquidator present.
CORAM : N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 24 September 2013
P.C. :
. The learned counsel for the applicant states that by order dated 23 July 2013, the grievances made in the present application are satisfied and the applicant will co-ordinate with the Official Liquidator for the purpose of registering the crime/lodge FIR with the concerned Police Station.
N.M. JAMDAR, J.
Prashant Surendra Tanna
The Official Liquidator of M/s.Suprapti Plastics Ltd.
SICOM Ltd.
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
