The High Court observed that the impugned order was complied with, rendering the civil application infructuous and disposed of the same.
Civil Application No.10434 of 2012 was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca10434.12
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10434 OF 2012
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4284 OF 2011
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
...APPLICANTS
VERSUS
Uddhav Laxman Vaidya & ors.
...RESPONDENTS
...
Shri.S.S. Tope, A.G.P. for Applicants.
Shri.V.A. Dhakne Advocate for Resp. No.1.
Shri.G.R. Syed Advocate for Resp. No.2.
Shri. M.C. Syed Advocate for Resp. No.3.
...
CORAM: R.M. BORDE AND
A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATE : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2013
ORDER :
1. Heard. The order has been complied with
and hence the Application rendered infructuous.
Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.
[A.I.S. CHEEMA,J.] [R.M. BORDE,J.]
asb/NOV13
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
Uddhav Laxman Vaidya & ors.
R.M. BORDE
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court