Vijay @ Sohan Raghunandan Prajapati v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Bail Application rejected. Applicant alleged to have committed robbery, identified by witnesses, and with stolen property recovered from his possession. Court refused bail due to prima facie serious nature of the offence.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; applicant not released.
What the court decided
1
BA-771.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 771 of 2013
VIJAY @ SOHAN RAGHUNANDAN PPRAJAPATI
.. APPLICANT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .. RESPONDENT
Mr. Sudhir C. Halli, Advocate for the applicant Mrs. S. D. Shinde, APP for the State
CORAM:-ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 09/07/2013
P.C.
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant satisfies the conditions for release on bail in a serious offence of robbery.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vijay @ Sohan Raghunandan Pprajapati
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Abhay M. Thipsay
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court