Dismissed
Hanif Husainmiya Subhedar v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCBA/727/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application for bail allowed to be withdrawn due to framing of charge.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BA-727.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 727 OF 2013
MOHD. HANIF
HUSAINMIYA SUBHEDAR
.. APPLICANT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
.. RESPONDENT
Mr. S. A. Ingawale, Advocate for the applicant Mrs. R. V. Newton, APP for the State
Mr. S. V. Kotwal i/b Avinash Kamkhedkar, Advocate for the intervener.
CORAM:-ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 25/06/2013
P.C.
In the course of argument, since it transpires that a charge has already been framed, Mr. Shekhar Ingawale, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application.
(ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)
md.saleem
1/1
MOHD. HANIF
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
ABHAY M. THIPSAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court