A bail application was withdrawn by the applicant with liberty to renew it after the filing of charges. The application was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mhi 1
BA-1124-13.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1124 OF 2013
Anand Hanmantu Rathod
... Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondents
Mr.Priyal G. Sarda,Advocate for the applicant. Ms. M.R.Tidake,APP,for the respondent-State
CORAM: SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 24th July, 2013
P.C.
The learned APP submits that the investigation is in progress and
therefore the applicant does not deserve to be enlarged on bail. The learned
Counsel for the applicant submits that in that eventuality he will withdraw the present application with liberty to renew the prayer for bail after filing of charge. Sheet.
Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)
Anand Hanmantu Rathod
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
