Single-judge order dismissing a criminal revision application challenging a Family Court maintenance grant and a separate bail application, held infructuous, for the applicant's undue delay and failure to prosecute.
Dismissing the criminal revision application and the bail application held infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) (7) Revn 160/12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Amk
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 160 OF 2012
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 163 OF 2012
Babaram Chikne
.. Applicant
Vs.
Jayashree Babaram Chikne & Anr. .. Respondents
Ms. Sunita Khamkar i/b Mr. Sameer Tendulkar for the Applicant. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATE : 18th JANUARY, 2013.
P.C.
(2) (7) Revn 160/12
mother. The husband failed to remain present after the trial Court effected service. Consequently the order came to be passed.
(3) (7) Revn 160/12
order is not even annexed to the application. It was tendered by Counsel on behalf of the applicant.
(ROSHAN DALVI, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application for setting aside a maintenance order can be allowed due to innocent filing without prosecution.
Whether an applicant simplicitor filing a revision application without staying the impugned order or obtaining admission is entitled to time.
Babaram Chikne
Jayashree Babaram Chikne & Anr.
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
