The High Court at Nagpur allowed an application filed to amend Criminal Application No. 36/2012, which had earlier not been admitted, directing the amendment within one week.
Amendment to Criminal Application No. 36/2012 allowed to be carried out within one week; matter stood over for reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application [APPP] No. 71 of 2013 IN
Criminal Application [APL] 36 of 2012
[Prashant Shrawan Shahare Vs. State of Mah. & another]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. M.P. Kariya, Adv., for the applicant.
Mrs. Joshi, APP for respondent no.1.
Mr. Raju Dhoble, Adv., holding for Mr. P.S. Tidke,
Adv., for respondent no.2.
CORAM: A.P. LAVANDE AND
A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.
DATE : 06th February, 2013.
Heard.
This is an application for amendment of
Criminal Application No. 36 of 2012, which has
not been admitted.
Hence application is allowed. Amendment
to main application be carried out within a
period of one week.
Application stands disposed of.
------
2
Criminal Application No.36/12:
Additional reply, if any, on behalf of
respondents be filed within two weeks.
Stand over to 27th February, 2013.
JudgeJudge
|Hedau|
Prashant Shrawan Shahare
State of Mah.
another
A.P. Lavande
A.B. Chaudhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court