Disposed
Sheetal Santosh Railkar (Intervener) v. Vishal @ Sonu Rajendra Srivastav and Anr.
Bombay HCAPPP/290/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Tilak IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(2)APPP-290-13
Tilak
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.290 of 2013 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.534 of 2013
Sheetal Santosh Railkar
... Applicant/Intervenor
In the matter between
Vishal @ Sonu Rajendra Srivastav ... Orig.applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
None present for the applicant/Intervenor
Mrs.S.V.Sonawane, APP for the State.
Mr.S.V.Marwadi ib Mr.Sandeep Dere, Advocate for the original applicant in BA 534/13.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.
DATED : JULY 2, 2013
P.C.
1 Since the Bail Application has been rejected, Intervention Application does not survive and stands disposed of.
( ABHAY M.THIPSAY,J )
Vishal @ Sonu Rajendra Srivastav
Sheetal Santosh Railkar
The State of Maharashtra
ABHAY M. THIPSAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court