The High Court rejected an application for bail to the accused in a communal clash case involving Sections 302, 307 IPC, holding that no case exists to release him on bail.
Application disposed of; no bail granted; Sessions Trial to be disposed in six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
(1) CRI.APPLN.NO.5158/2013
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5158 OF 2013
SK. MUKHTYAR @ MUKHTYA HATTI SK. YUSUF VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr.Syed Masood Chand APP for Respondents: Mr.M.M.Nerlikar
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. Dated: October 24, 2013
PER COURT :-
agp/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
(2) CRI.APPLN.NO.5158/2013
instance of the accused / applicant, no case to release him on bail. Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, who is seized with Sessions Case No.114/2013, is requested to dispose of the sessions trial within a time frame of six months after receiving communication.
Unnecessary accommodation to the accused / applicant or the prosecution should be avoided.
Observations are restricted for the present application. Application (No.5158/2013) disposed of.
agp/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused applicant is entitled to bail in a case involving grievous hurt and culpable homicide not amounting to murder in a communal clash context
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SK. MUKHTYAR @ MUKHTYA HATTI SK. YUSUF
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
