Laxman Pundlik Suvarnakar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
null
What did the court decide?
Application for permission to assist Public Prosecutor allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra3447.13
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3447 OF 2013
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2967 OF 2013
Laxman s/o Pundlik Suvarnakar
...APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & anr.
...RESPONDENTS
...
Shri.A.S. Shejwal Advocate for Applicant.
Shri.S.D. Kaldate, A.P.P. for Resp. No.1.
Shri.R.N. Dhorde, Senior Counsel i/b. Shri.
V.D. Gunale Advocate for Resp. No.2.
...
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ
DATE : 11TH JULY, 2013
ORDER :
1. Heard. For the reasons stated in the
Application and after considering the submissions
advanced, the Application for permission to assist
to Public Prosecutor is allowed.
[A.I.S. CHEEMA,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.]
asb/JUL13
Laxman s/o Pundlik Suvarnakar
The State of Maharashtra & anr.
NARESH H. PATIL
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court