The High Court of Bombay bench at Aurangabad disposed of Criminal Application No.3178 of 2013 without expressing an opinion on merits due to subsequent developments, directing applicants to pursue alternative legal remedies.
Direction to applicants to resort to appropriate remedies available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3178 OF 2013
Ilahi s/o Farid Bagavan & ors....APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ANR....RESPONDENTS
.....
Shri S.J. Salgare, Advocate holding for
Shri S.B. Choudhari, Advocate for applicants
Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.P.P. for R.No.1/State
Shri H.A. Joshi, Advocate for R.No.2
.....
CORAM:NARESH H. PATIL &
A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATED:1st August, 2013.
PER COURT:
1.Heard. In view of the subsequent
developments, we do not express any opinion on
merits of the matter. The applicants may resort
to appropriate remedy available in law. Criminal
Application is disposed of.
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.)(NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
fmp/cri3178.13
Ilahi s/o Farid Bagavan & ors
The State of Maharashtra & ANR
NARESH H. PATIL
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court